AscentJoin the waitlist

How much load is too much?

Ascent weighs every climb, adds up your last 7 days and compares them with your usual week. Here's the formula, the 80 to 130% band, and why the band is a rule of thumb for planning, never a prediction of injury.

Ascent's Load screen: 99% of your usual week, In range, with the band from Light under 80% through In range 80 to 130% to Spiking over 130%, and eight weeks of weekly load.

Every climb has a weight

Ascent counts tries, not sessions, and weighs each try by how hard the climb was for you. "For you" means against your normal grade: the grade you usually send. Ascent suggests it from the middle of your sends on that scale over the last 28 days, and you can set it yourself.

load = tries × 2(grade − normal) ÷ 2

A try at your normal grade weighs 1. Two grades above, it weighs 2; two grades below, half. Tries that don't end in a send count too, because they load your fingers just the same.

A grade step means one step on the gym's own scale: one number, one V grade or one kyu, half a step for French and Font grades, and two and a half for a color in a color circuit, because each color spans about three V grades.

What a climb adds to your week
ClimbAdds
One try at your normal grade1
One try, two grades above2
One try, two grades below0.5
Three tries, one grade above4.24
Five tries, four grades above20

Your week against your usual week

Ascent adds up the last 7 days, today included. Your usual week is the average of the 4 weeks before that: the 28 days before the last 7, divided by 4. Both windows roll forward every day, so Load doesn't drop to zero every Monday.

Load needs those 4 weeks of history before it can compare. Until then, Today shows your sessions this week against your weekly target instead.

The 80 to 130% band

Load is this week as a share of your usual week, in three bands:

Lightunder 80%

In range80 to 130%

Spikingover 130%

Try your own week

133% Spiking

160 against a usual week of 120 is 133%: over 130%, so Load reads Spiking.

A rule of thumb, not a forecast

The band comes from the acute to chronic workload ratio: this week's load against what you're used to. Tim Gabbett's 2016 review argued that sharp rises above what athletes are prepared for go with more injuries, and that high load built up steadily can protect (Gabbett 2016).

Newer research disputes the ratio as an injury predictor. Impellizzeri and colleagues showed in 2021 that its apparent link to injury can come from the way it's calculated, and that it has little power to predict who gets hurt (Impellizzeri et al. 2021). Neither study was about climbers.

So Ascent uses the band as a planning aid. It tells you when a week is well above or below what you usually do, after a trip, a break or a comp, so you can choose on purpose. It never says you will or won't get hurt. And Load counts only climbing: not your off-wall training, and none of the other load the IOC consensus describes, such as psychological stress and travel (Soligard et al. 2016).

What Ascent does with it

  • The Load ring on Today turns lime in range, amber when spiking and stays neutral when light.
  • Load detail shows the last 8 weeks, each against its own usual week, and lists the sessions that counted this week.
  • Load rules from Body, like "Max 2 crimpy sessions a week" while a finger heals, are separate: they count sessions you and your physio set, not Load. How to track an injury.
  • With Ascent Pro, the Coach reads your Load when it suggests a change to your plan. It proposes; your load rules, taper and injury limits decide, and nothing changes until you accept.
Ascent's Today screen during a session, with the Load ring lime at 99%, In range, beside the Progress and Body rings.
Today in Ascent. The Load ring is lime at 99% of your usual week, in range.

Sources

  1. Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?Br J Sports Med 2016;50(5):273 to 280. Research library source 13: where the acute to chronic workload ratio comes from.
  2. Impellizzeri FM et al. What role do chronic workloads play in the acute to chronic workload ratio? Time to dismiss ACWR and its underlying theorySports Med 2021;51(3):581 to 592. Research library source 14: why the ratio doesn't predict injury.
  3. Soligard T et al. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injuryBr J Sports Med 2016;50(17):1030 to 1041. Research library source 15: what counts as load.

Any gym, any board, any scale.

Ascent is a bouldering log for iPhone that answers one question: am I actually improving? No account, and your log is one file on your phone.

Join the waitlist